George from đšprodmgmt.world (@nurijanian) on X
Georgeâs post argues PMs should invert bad solutions-first roadmaps by quickly reframing proposed features into concrete customer problems before killing them; Cody pushes on whether this defers or distracts from real trade-offs, while Justy sees it as a practical communication tool for skeptical stakeholders.
Transcript
Justy âokay, this is gonna sound insane on a podcast, but Iâll bite: PM walks in, roadmap is already a list of âship thisâ tasks, and the trick is to invert every one of them into a customer problem before shooting them down?
Cody Mm-hm.
Justy Like, the feature request becomes âwhat pain does this solve?â and suddenly the room either admits there isnât one or has to name it under pressure?
Cody Sure, but inversion doesnât make the trade-offs disappearâit just relabels them.
Justy So youâre saying itâs a placebo?
Cody Iâm saying itâs a conversational pivot, not a product filter. You still have to argue the money, the timeline, the opportunity cost. That part doesnât magically get easier.
Justy âŚFair. But if youâre the new PM with zero credibility yet, and the teamâs already wedded to âmove fast and break thingsâ, framing the request as âwho exactly is this for?â buys you thirty seconds to pivot to the right thing.
Cody Thirty seconds, maybe. Thirty seconds of âwait, why are we building this again?â doesnât fix a roadmap that shouldâve been questioned six months ago.
Justy No, but if the team hears it from the new PMâs mouth instead of you yelling at them to read the room, they might actually listen for once.
Cody Or theyâll just roll their eyes and keep shipping widgets.
Justy You ever been the new person in a Tuesday stand-up where someoneâs demoing a half-baked feature and the roomâs nodding along like itâs genius?
Cody Yeah. I showed up to one last month and they were about to ship a âquick winâ that added three more forms to the customer portal. Took fifteen minutes of quiet âwhoâs this forâ to derail the momentum.
Justy Ugh, I had a similar one yesterdayâour new enterprise guy walked into a roadmap review and the first ask was âcan we add a dark mode for power users?â I kid you not.
Cody Dark mode as a top-line feature. Thatâs the inversion target right there: âwhat customer pain does dark mode solve in enterprise land?â Spoiler: none theyâll admit to.
Justy Exactly. So you flip it: âdark mode for power users sounds like a nice-to-have; what workflow friction does it actually reduce?â and suddenly the roomâs forced to say âuh⌠productivity nightmares we havenât measuredâ or shut up.
Cody Or theyâll pivot to âwell, itâs a competitive checkboxââwhich is its own flavor of bad roadmap logic.
Justy True. But even competitive checkboxes have to be owned by someone, and if the checkbox has no owner, you just exposed a lie the teamâs been telling itself.
Justy Back to the mechanism: Georgeâs trick is to literally rewrite every solution on the roadmap as a concrete customer problem in under a minute?
Cody Under âquick rhetorical flourishâ pressure, sure. The risk is it becomes a party gameââwho can weasel this into a customer pain fastest?ââand the real work of scoping and feasibility gets deferred to the next meeting where no oneâs listening anymore.
Justy Thatâs on the room, not the trick. If the roomâs allergic to trade-off talk, a quick âflip itâ buys you thirty seconds to steer toward something real.
Cody Thirty seconds of âcustomer painâ theater isnât the same as thirty seconds of âhereâs why this will cost us six engineer-months and three compliance reviewsâ.
Justy âŚOkay, fair. But the post isnât arguing the flip replaces the hard conversation; itâs arguing the flip surfaces when the hard conversation is missing. Thatâs useful.
Cody Useful, but not sufficient. Teams still need a product muscle that goes beyond rhetorical inversion.
Justy Who should actually care about this move? Practicing PMs who joined a team thatâs already shipped a year of âship thisâ epics.
Cody And product leaders who inherited a backlog they didnât shape.
Justy Not the CEO with a fire hose of ideas, not the founding engineer shipping their pet projectâthis is a survival skill for the PM walking into someone elseâs mess.
Cody Survival, maybe. But if the mess is systemicâlike, the org rewards shipping over learningâthen a handful of âflip itâ moments wonât fix the system.
Justy No, but itâs a start. At least the room starts arguing about the right thing instead of the thing they all showed up to defend five minutes ago.
Cody âŚFine. Itâs a communication hack with diminishing returns, but itâs better than nodding along.
Justy You ever tried this in a room full of engineers whoâve already designed the feature in their heads?
Cody I tried it once. The lead engineer literally said, âthe customer wants a green button.â I kid you not.
Justy Oh my god. And you flipped it?
Cody I said, âwhat pain does the green button solve?â He said, ânone, but itâs green.â Then I said, âso weâre building a green button because itâs green?â and the room fell silent for thirty seconds. Product moment.
Justy Anywayâsigning off. Cody, next time someone says âjust add dark modeâ, remember the inversion trick. Youâre welcome.
Cody Sure, Justy. Iâll flip it to âwhy are we building this?â and wait for the explosion.